ContractsProf Blog

Editor: Myanna Dellinger
University of South Dakota School of Law

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Employee bonuses as "unjust enrichment"

Aaa Some contract law types have floated the idea of "unjust enrichment" law as a means of clawing back compensation paid to employees at failing firms.  A union-affiliated investment advising company is now raising just that theory in a call to Bank of America to go after some of the $3.6 billion in employee compensation that Merrill Lynch & Co. paid to employees in December 2008, just before its acquisition by BAC.

CtW Investment Group, in an open letter to BAC directors, is demanding that the company recoup individual bonuses of over $1 million paid to 696 Merrill employees.  CtW (sic) argues:

[T]hese bonus payments, which came at the expense of Bank of America and its shareholders, constitute “unjust enrichment” under Delaware Law. The Delaware Supreme Court has defined unjust enrichment as “the unjust retention of a benefit to the loss of another, or the retention of money or property of another against the fundamental principles of justice or equity and good conscience.”  Schock v. Nash, 732 A.2d.217,232 (Del. 1999).

The Schock opinion is here.

[Frank Snyder]

In the News | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Employee bonuses as "unjust enrichment":


Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.