ContractsProf Blog

Editor: Myanna Dellinger
University of South Dakota School of Law

Monday, April 23, 2007

Limerick of the Week

Sherrodd, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen is a great teaching case.  It never ceases to outrage at least some students and thus leads to a very fruitful discussion of the pitfalls of the parol evidence rule.  In addition, it shows that a formal approach to contracts law is still with us, as the following Limerick illustates:

Sherrodd, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen

Behold, parol's bitter fruit:
Sherrodd's claim was deemed moot!
If he'd only known,
The great Corbin would groan
To see Williston's rule win repute.

[Jeremy Telman]

Famous Cases, Limericks, Teaching | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Limerick of the Week:


Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.