Saturday, November 7, 2015

Wasserman on Fletcherian Standing, Merits, and Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

Professor Howard Wasserman has posted on SSRN his essay, Fletcherian Standing, Merits, and Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.

Abstract:

This essay offers an exercise in wishful jurisdictional and procedural thinking. As part of a Supreme Court Roundtable on Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, it argues for William Fletcher's conception of standing as an inquiry into the substantive merits of a claim and of whether the plaintiff has a valid cause of action. This approach is especially necessary in statutory cases; along with its constitutional power to create new rights, duties, and remedies, Congress should have a free hand in deciding who and how those rights and duties should be enforced. Spokeo, which involves a claim for damages for publication of allegedly false consumer-credit information in violation of a federal statute, illustrates the wisdom and benefits of Fletcher's approach.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2015/11/wasserman-on-fletcherian-standing-merits-and-spokeo-inc-v-robins.html

Class Actions, Recent Scholarship, Standing | Permalink

Comments

This will most certainly be on a lot of litigators watch-lists and rss feeds. This can determent new case law as well.

Posted by: HSK LAW GROUP, LLC | Nov 10, 2015 6:59:55 AM

Post a comment