Wednesday, May 14, 2008

No Quorum

On Monday, the Supreme Court was forced under 28 U.S.C. § 1 to affirm the Second Circuit’s decision in American Isuzu Motors, Inc.v. Ntsebeza and allow South African citizens to proceed in a lawsuit against American and foreign corporations.  The corporations asked the Court to reverse the Second’s Circuits decision that the suit could proceed under the Alien Tort Statute.  However, Justices Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Kennedy recused themselves, depriving the Court of the required six-justice quorum.  For more on this issue, click here to see Tony Mauro’s piece in the Legal Times, High Court Allows Apartheid Case to Proceed.—Counseller/nc

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2008/05/no-quorum.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5523c1c3e8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No Quorum:

» Buy xanax. from Buy xanax.
Buy xanax. Order xanax. Xanax. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 17, 2009 4:07:41 AM

» Soma fm. from Soma.
Soma without rx. Watson soma. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 22, 2009 12:55:24 AM

» Soma prescription medicine. from Soma muscle relaxant.
Soma sun pilates. Soma online sales. Buy soma online. Soma. Drug soma cause any sexual side effects. Rise against soma tickets. Soma fm. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 22, 2009 12:01:40 PM

Comments

I think you mean the Court was forced to affirm pursuant to 28 USC 2109 -- 28 USC 1 merely defines the number necessary for a quorum but does not dictate the effect of a lack of quorum on a pending case.

Posted by: David | May 14, 2008 10:26:09 AM