• About
    • Resources
    • Shop Amazon
    • RSS
    • Network Information
      • Join the Network
      • Advertise on the Network
  • Law Professor Blogs Network
    Go to the Network Join the Network Advertise on the Network
  • About
  • Resources
  • Shop Amazon

Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
USC Gould School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, July 12, 2021

Revisiting the Bizarre SEP Level of Licensing Antitrust Controversy

By D Daniel Sokol

Share

Revisiting the Bizarre SEP Level of Licensing Antitrust Controversy

Jorge Padilla, Pekka Sääskilahti
 
 
Standardized technologies are often embedded in both intermediate products (such as chipsets or modules) and end products (such as smartphones or connected cars) that incorporate the intermediate products as components. In principle, owners of patents covering such technologies (standard-essential patents or SEPs) could license their SEPs to the manufacturers of intermediate products, the end-product manufacturers or, to the extent possible, given patent exhaustion constraints, to both.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2021/07/revisiting-the-bizarre-sep-level-of-licensing-antitrust-controversy.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment


This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support LPBN Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.

Join Amazon Prime - Watch Over 40,000 Movies

Recent Comments

  • hamide on Innovation and Appropriability: Revisiting the Role of Intellectual Property
  • Trilegal on Dealing with India's New Antitrust Laws: Practical Tips
  • Javier Segura Ruiz on Economic Activity, Market Failure and Services of General Economic Interest: It Takes Two to Tango
  • Steven C. Salop on The Application of Antitrust Law to Labor Markets — Then and Now
  • Sumeet Kumar on Concentration and Resilience in the U.S. Meat Supply Chains
  • CALI
  • Advertise on LPBN

Recent Posts

  • Healthcare, Quality Concerns and Competition Law
  • Cartel Damages Claims, Passing-On and Passing-Back
  • Downstream Cross-Holdings and Upstream Collusion
  • A Theory of Monopolistic Competition with Horizontally Heterogeneous Consumers
  • EU antitrust in support of the Green Deal. Why better is not good enough 

Categories

Monthly Archive

StatCounter

PageViews Since October 18, 2004

Editors

D. Daniel Sokol
D. Daniel Sokol

Professor of Law
USC Gould School of Law

  • Profile
  • Email
  • SSRN Author Page

Contributing Editors

Shubha Ghosh

Professor of Law
Univ. of Wisconsin Law School

  • Profile
  • Email

© Copyright 2004- by Law Professor Blogs, LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright Policy.

© Copyright 2004- by Law Professor Blogs, LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright Policy.