Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

Vertical Arrangements and Upstream Mergers

Emmanuel Petrakis, University of Crete - Department of Economics and Panagiotis Skartados, University of Crete - Department of Economics address Vertical Arrangements and Upstream Mergers.

ABSTRACT: We study the incentives for horizontal upstream mergers in a quantity-setting vertically related industry, under bargain and endogenous contract types. We show that the contract types used could have important consequences for the equilibrium market structure and vice versa. If it is the retailers who choose contract types, they share the same preferences as the policymakers and choose to offer two-part tariff contracts, leading the suppliers not to merge. This result has some obvious policy implications. If it is the suppliers who decide contract types, they prefer to merge and offer a partial forward vertical ownership scheme. Under Bertrand competition, there is always an upstream merger, but the common manufacturer will offer a two-part tariff contract for intermediate bargain power levels. For high bargain power levels, he will choose a partial forward vertical ownership scheme, while for low bargain power will suffer from negative profits. A policymaker, considering the maximization of the social welfare should consider the upstream merger and two-part tariff contracts.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2018/11/vertical-arrangements-and-upstream-mergers.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment