Monday, June 22, 2015

Does Patent Licensing Mean Innovation?

Robin Feldman, University of California Hastings College of the Law and Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School ask Does Patent Licensing Mean Innovation?

ABSTRACT: A commonly offered justification for patent trolls or non-practicing entities (NPEs) is that they serve as a middleman facilitating innovation, bringing new technology from inventors to those who can implement it. We survey those involved in patent licensing to see how often patent licenses actually led to innovation or technology transfer. We find that very few patent licenses from assertion actually lead to new innovation; most are simply about paying for the freedom to keep doing what the licensee was already doing. Surprisingly, this is true not only of NPE licenses but even of licenses from product-producing companies and universities. Our results cast significant doubt on one common justification for patent rights.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2015/06/does-patent-licensing-mean-innovation.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01b8d116fe29970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does Patent Licensing Mean Innovation?:

Comments

Post a comment