Monday, January 27, 2014

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION POLICY TOWARDS THE LICENSING OF STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENTS: WHERE DO WE STAND?

Damien Geradin (Covington, George Mason) asks THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION POLICY TOWARDS THE LICENSING OF STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENTS: WHERE DO WE STAND?

ABSTRACT: Defining the circumstances in which the licensing conduct or litigation strategy of a standard-essential patent (SEP) holder amounts to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of Article 102 of the Treaty has been one of the most intractable issues for the European Commission given the significance of the interests at stake and the diversity of opinions among stakeholders. Although the Commission has spent most of the past ten years investigating alleged abuses committed by SEP holders, many issues, such as the meaning of FRAND and the compatibility with Article 102 of injunctions sought by SEP holders to enforce their patents, remain unresolved given the lack of clear precedents. This article provides a critical review of the main investigations carried out by the Commission over the past decade, including pending cases before the Commission and the European Court of Justice.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2014/01/the-european-commission-policy-towards-the-licensing-of-standard-essential-patents-where-do-we-stand.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019b01c8ddb2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION POLICY TOWARDS THE LICENSING OF STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENTS: WHERE DO WE STAND?:

Comments

Post a comment