Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Monday, May 27, 2013

Analyzing Competition Among Internet Players: Qihoo 360 v. Tencent

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

David S. Evans, Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, & Howard H. Chang (Global Economics Group) are Analyzing Competition Among Internet Players: Qihoo 360 v. Tencent.

ABSTRACT: In one of the most significant antitrust decisions since China implemented the Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML") in 2008, the Guangdong High People's Court ("Guangdong High Court") dismissed claims on anticompetitive bundling and exclusionary practice brought by Qihoo 360 against Tencent. The Guangdong High Court issued an 80-page decision that provided a relatively sophisticated and nuanced analysis of market definition and market power that examined internet-based competition, recognized the importance of multi-sided platforms in this competition, and highlighted the critical role of dynamic competition.

Although Qihoo 360 has appealed the decision to China's Supreme Court it now stands as both a landmark decision in China and an exemplar of serious antitrust analysis of the internet sector for courts and competition authorities around the world.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2013/05/analyzing-competition-among-internet-players-qihoo-360-v-tencent.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01901c7cc4d7970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Analyzing Competition Among Internet Players: Qihoo 360 v. Tencent:

Comments

Post a comment