Monday, October 29, 2012

The Rule of Reason Re-Examined

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Ned Cavanagh, St. John's University - School of Law has a new work on The Rule of Reason Re-Examined.

ABSTRACT: This article analyzes the application of the Rule of Reason as articulated by Justice Brandeis in Chicago Board of Trade v. United States to alleged restraints of trade in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. It argues that the Brandeis formulation, which requires courts to consider a broad range of economic factors and then weigh procompetitive benefits against anticompetitive effects, has proven unwieldy in the hands of trial judges. Because the Brandeis formulation provides little guidance as to how these factors should be weighed, courts have struggled to develop clear, predictable, and consistent standards under section 1. This article considers several alternatives to the Brandeis formulation and recommends that courts can revitalize the Rule of Reason by using the highly structured approach of the D.C. Circuit in the Three Tenors case to develop antitrust rules that are clear, predictable, and administrable.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2012/10/the-rule-of-reason-re-examined.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017d3c4e28b8970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Rule of Reason Re-Examined:

Comments

Post a comment