Monday, January 6, 2020

Takeaways from the 2020 AALS Annual Meeting

You have so much to explore and express, but . . .  you may be asking yourself, is my story good enough? The answer is yes! – Schan B. Ellis

I can think of no better way to begin the new year than by sending kudos to the AALS Section on Academic Support, the executive board, and the planning committee for a fabulous panel session. If you did not attend the AALS Annual Meeting in Washington, DC, you missed a treat. The Academic Support session held on Friday, January 3, was attended by law school deans and administrators, clinical and doctrinal faculty outside of ASP, testing and learning specialists, and academic support professionals. To a standing-room-only crowd, a diverse panel of presenters shared their research and insights on the role of faculty in delivering academic support, academic archetypes that signal risks of law school underperformance and bar exam failure, potential gender biases in standardized testing, and bar examination, and the impact of bar exam cut scores on diversity in the legal profession.

I have attended the annual meeting many times. From New York to New Orleans, and from San Diego to Washington, AALS provides a unique opportunity to connect with professors and law school professionals in a welcoming smorgasbord of panel presentations and enriching roundtable sessions. Although I am a veteran AALS attendee, this year I saw the conference through the lens of a presenter for the very first time. I had become quite comfortable listening to and learning from others, and this time I sat at the presenters’ table instead of in the audience.

To say that I was nervous would be an understatement of enormous proportion. Even more daunting was the intimidating company of expert co-panelists that I found myself in. My panel included tenured professor and renowned ASP scholar Catherine Christopher from Texas Tech; published textbook author Jane Grise from the University of Kentucky; and Dean emeritus and UNLV law professor Joan Howarth. I was so busy taking notes from their presentations that I could barely focus on my own.

My point to anyone who has an article idea in gestation: do not convince yourself that you don’t have something worthwhile to say. I was so impressed by how broadly attended the session was, and I could only think that we need more novice scholars to share their works in progress and innovative ideas for the good of the profession. I encourage my ASP colleagues to respond to the call for proposals for the 2020 AASE Conference and the 2021 AALS Section on Academic Support session. It was a fabulous experience for me . . . and if I can do it, surely you can too.

(Marsha Griggs)

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/academic_support/2020/01/takeaways-from-the-2020-aals-annual-meeting.html

Academic Support Spotlight, Meetings, Travel | Permalink

Comments

And you did a terrific job! What an great panel!

Posted by: James | Jan 7, 2020 12:10:01 PM

Your paper is going to be game-changing. I can't wait to read it. (So get writing!!)

Posted by: Cassie Christopher | Jan 7, 2020 1:15:12 PM

This panel was simply phenomenal, and it really inspired me upon returning to work. I hope we can continue to produce solid scholarship of law teaching & learning to get to a point that paradigm shifts the nature of what "academic success" means for law students - it's an institutional concern, not just a department or unit's. I personally think overlaying some models from undergraduate education (where feasible) could help (e.g., professors having a set of advisees, etc.). I look forward to exploring the pedagogy with you, colleagues!

Posted by: Greg Bordelon | Jan 9, 2020 9:12:17 AM

Post a comment