Monday, June 20, 2011

More Oversight At the Top - Avoiding Needless Prosecutions

Sue Reisinger at Corporate Counsel has this fascinating piece titled, Why Didn't the Maryland U.S. Attorney Sign the Lauren Stevens Indictment?  But there are some additional questions that need answers.  Why if a top US Attorney is not willing to sign the Indictment did senior officials at DOJ's criminal division not intercede?  And if they did re-examine the case, did they authorize proceeding with this case? (For background on the dismissal of this case by the judge, see here).

There is something to be said about an indictment coming from the district bringing the charges - it's an aspect of venue.  Prosecutors from that district get to look at the case in comparison to other matters being prosecuted in that district, in order to determine if this merits expending funds for a prosecution.  Having outsiders brought in to consider a prosecution may be warranted, especially when the prosecutor has a conflict.  But in any event, someone at the top needs to examine whether the prosecution is warranted.

(esp)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2011/06/more-oversight-at-the-top-avoiding-needless-prosecutions.html

Obstruction, Prosecutions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01538f4f8841970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Oversight At the Top - Avoiding Needless Prosecutions:

Comments

Post a comment