Monday, June 20, 2011

Latest Lauren Stevens Bombshell: Maryland U.S. Attorney Refused To Sign Indictment

Corporate Counsel's Sue Reisinger reports here that Rod Rosenstein, the universally respected U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, refused to sign his name on either Lauren Stevens indictment, because he did not believe that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction. The case was prosecuted by District of Massachusetts AUSAs, but venue was found in Maryland. The typical practice is for the U.S. Attorney in the district of prosecution to sign all indictments issued by the grand juries in his/her district, or at least to have his/her signature block signed by an AUSA. This did not happen in the Stevens case. Rosenstein, a former colleague of mine, is the quintessence of straight-arrowhood. His failure, literally, to sign-off on the Stevens charges surely sent an important signal to Judge Roger Titus, who threw the case out under Rule 29. Let me give you an idea of how well respected this Jimmy Stewart, Boy Scout, is. Rosenstein, the Republican appointee in an overwhelmingly Democratic state with two Democratic U.S. Senators, has yet to be replaced, even though a Democrat has held the White House for 2 and one-half years. The story of the Stevens prosecution gets curiouser and curiouser.

(wisenberg)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2011/06/latest-lauren-stevens-bombshell-maryland-us-attorney-refused-to-sign-indictment.html

Obstruction, Prosecutions, Prosecutors | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01543322b8f0970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Latest Lauren Stevens Bombshell: Maryland U.S. Attorney Refused To Sign Indictment:

Comments

Can it possibly be - that Diogenes quest has at long last been fulfilled?

Posted by: Laser Haas | Jun 20, 2011 4:00:53 PM

Post a comment