Monday, June 6, 2011

Do You Really Need Five DOJ Lawyers to Prosecute John Edwards

A key problem when a DC Prosecution team is sent in to investigate and perhaps indict on conduct, is that they examine the conduct out of the context of the typical case seen in the local U.S. Attorneys' Office.  They don't see the run-of-the-mill drug, immigration, or fraud case that typically comes through the U.S. Attorneys' Office. They become champions of a single or multiple case that they investigate, and with a single lens proceed or not proceed with their cause. 

One has to wonder if this may be playing a part in the John Edwards prosecution.  Mike Scarcella, over at the BLT Blog, notes here that the Public Integrity prosecutors are teaming up with some local prosecutors in this case. But it seems according to his blog entry that "a former chairman of the Federal Election Commission," is saying that the alleged activity is not criminal - and is not even a civil violation.

Whether the prosecutors, or Edwards and his defense team and others, are correct on whether this is a crime or even civil violation, is only half the problem. The other half is why are five lawyers from the department of justice working on an alleged election violation case.  There is some real crime out there - even some real white collar crimes like identity theft and credit card fraud.  Wouldn't our tax dollars be better spent on this?

(esp)   

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2011/06/do-you-really-need-five-doj-lawyers-to-prosecute-john-edwards.html

Celebrities, Investigations, Prosecutions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e88f22c22970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do You Really Need Five DOJ Lawyers to Prosecute John Edwards:

Comments

Post a comment