Monday, April 18, 2011

Ninth Circuit Offers No Relief in Post-Skilling Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. Pelisamen ruled that "where the jury returned a special verdict form indicating that it had convicted the defendant on both theories" ("money and propery" and "honest services") the conviction remains valid post-Skilling because the jury has designated that it convicted the defendant on both theories. This case differs from the Skilling remand, where there was an alternative theory issue.  Here in Pelisamen it is clear that the jury looked at both items and convicted on both.  But one also has to wonder if evidence of honest services taints the jury with prejudicial evidence. And one additionally has to wonder why the government felt it necessary to charge honest services if they had such a strong case premised on "money or property."

(esp)(hat tip to Linda Friedman Ramirez)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2011/04/ninth-circuit.html

Fraud, Prosecutions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01538de453d8970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ninth Circuit Offers No Relief in Post-Skilling Case:

Comments

Post a comment