Thursday, June 24, 2010

More on Honest Services and Skilling

GUEST BLOGGER-SOLOMON L. WISENBERG

The breakdown is as follows. All nine justices agree that the judgments in the three honest services fraud cases must be vacated and remanded. The majority rules that Section 1346 honest services fraud encompasses only bribery and kickback schemes, and would be unconstitutionally vague if interpreted more broadly. The majority opinion in Skilling (and Black) is written by Justice Ginsburg, who is joined by five other justices. Justice Scalia (joined by Justices Thomas and Kennedy) concurs, but would simply hold Section 1346 unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process Clause and would not seek to salvage it through a narrowing interpretation.

The jury instructions in all of the cases allowed for conviction under the now-discredited broad view of honest services. The lower courts must decide whether the instructional errors were harmless.

Jefffrey Skilling's fair trial arguments were rejected 6-3, with Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Stevens and Breyer, dissenting.

Conrad Black and co-defendants properly preserved their objections to the jury charge.

All of this is based on my quick skim. More detailed analysis will come later.

Once more, here are the slip opions in Skilling, Black, and Weyhrauch.


(slw)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2010/06/more-on-honest-services-and-skilling.html

Current Affairs, Enron, Fraud, Judicial Opinions, News, Prosecutions, SEC, Securities, Statutes | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133f1b9ca80970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on Honest Services and Skilling:

Comments

Post a comment