« November 2, 2008 - November 8, 2008 | Main | November 16, 2008 - November 22, 2008 »

November 14, 2008

Supreme Court Grants Cert in White Collar Case

The U.S. Supreme Court accepted certiorari in the case of Yeager v. United States.  The issue presented is "[w]hether, under the Double Jeopardy Clause, the government may retry defendants acquitted of some charges on factually related counts on which the jury failed to reach a verdict."  For the Opinion from the 5th Circuit, the Petition for Certiorari, the Brief in Opposition, the Petitioner's Reply, and the Amicus Brief filed in support of the defendants, see Scotus Blog here.

See also Kristen Hays, Houston Chronicle, High court takes case of Enron Broadband defendant

(esp)

November 14, 2008 in Judicial Opinions | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Siegelman - A More Pressing Need to Re-examine

In my My Wish List to President Barack Obama & The Next AG I mention the need for the next AG to "Conduct an investigation on cases such as former Alabama Governor Siegelman and Cyril Wecht and if politics played any role - do the right thing."  But the need may be more pressing here.   Adam Zagorin of Time Magazine has an article titled, More Allegations of Misconduct in Alabama Governor case.

Congressman Conyors, chair of the Committee on the Judiciary has written a letter to AG Mukasey that raises some important questions.  More to come later.

(esp)

Addendum - Ben Evans, Miami Herald (AP), Recused US Attorney Discussed Siegelman Case

November 14, 2008 in News | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

My Wish List to President Barack Obama & The Next AG

We all have our wish lists of things we would like accomplished in this new administration.  And when it comes to the administration of DOJ, it is easy to list many items such as matters related to GITMO, etc. So, limited to white collar crime issues - my two cents -

To the New AG -

And to President Barack Obama -

Readers - all yours -

(esp)

Addendum from Readers -

Michael C. Durney - I would add only one thought: DOJ should reinstitute the old (circa 1960s-) rule of charging: The test is not can we indict, but should we indict.

John Wesley Hall, President of NACDL - Put restoring DOJ's credibility to the top of the list

November 14, 2008 in Prosecutors | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack

November 13, 2008

White Collar Crime Declinations - Do They Vary from District to District

Is it really possible that certain areas of the country decline more white collar prosecutions than other areas? The Resource Management of US Attorneys' Offices - US Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division issued an Audit Report dated November 2008. The Report provides some interesting numbers. Although there is no definition of white collar crime, to truly determine what is included and what is excluded from this category, the Audit Report provides a chart (Exhibit 4-5, p. 45) that shows that in 2003: 6100 white collar matters were filed, 4,575 were declined, and 1,533 were pending.  Contrast this with 2007: 3,324 were filed, 798 declined, and 7593 were pending. The bottom line - a lot less cases were filed and a lot less declined.

Later exhibits in this report discuss specific districts.  For example,  the Southern District of Florida declines only 10.01% of its white collar crime cases.  In contrast, the Southern District of West Virginia declines 41.27% of its white collar cases.  So does this mean that if you commit a white collar crime in Florida, you have a much greater chance of the charges going forward?

See also Pamela A. MacLean, National Law Jrl, Report Criticizes Office That Allocates Resources to U.S. Attorneys

(esp)

November 13, 2008 in Think Tank Reports | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

In the News and Around the Blogosphere

A DOJ Press Release states that three leading electronics manufacturers "have agreed to plead guilty and pay a total of $585 million in criminal fines for their roles in conspiracies to fix prices in the sale of liquid crystal display (LCD) panels."

Dan Slater, WSJ Blog, Kozlowski: Hard to Reconcile AIG Bailout With $6,000 Shower Curtain

(esp)

November 13, 2008 in News | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Welcome - Research Associate to the White Collar Crime Blog

Welcome Whitney Curtis, Reference/Instructional Services Librarian of Stetson University College of Law Library, who is the new research associate for the white collar crime blog.

(esp)

November 13, 2008 in About This Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

William Jefferson - Won the Election, But The Criminal Case Is Still There

Congressman William J. Jefferson receiving 57% of the votes in his bid for re-election to Congress (see here), may be facing a tougher issue as he lost his argument for dismissal of the criminal case pending against him, an indictment with conspiracy and substantive offenses. (see Indictment) (see here commentary on the Indictment).  The district court had previously held that the grand jury proceedings and Indictment did not implicate the Speech and Debate Clause. 

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (opinion here) rejected Jefferson's contention that:

"the grand jury was improperly presented with evidence of his legislative acts and that such evidence was relevant to its decision to indict. He asserts that the Indictment thus contravenes the legislative immunity provided to him by the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 6, cl. 1, and must be dismissed."

In rejecting Jefferson's claim that the case should be dismissed, the Fourth Circuit stated:

"we are satisfied that the district court, in conducting the pretrial proceedings, accorded Congressman Jefferson every substantive and procedural protection to which he was entitled. As the court explained in its Opinion, it decided to analyze the Excerpts and review in camera certain grand jury materials "because the Speech or Debate Clause protection afforded legislators is so important, and out of an abundance of caution." United States v. Jefferson, 534 F. Supp. 2d 645, 649 (E.D. Va. 2008) (emphasis added). After conducting its review, the court concluded that the grand jury had not considered any Speech or Debate Clause material. See id. at 654. The court acknowledged, however — and we agree — that the controlling authorities did not compel such a comprehensive review. See id. at 649. Under the facts of this case, however, the court’s decision to act as it did in assessing Jefferson’s Speech or Debate Clause Claim was within its discretion and entirely appropriate. With the foregoing principles in mind, we are content to reject Jefferson’s request for further review of the grand jury record, and we affirm the district court’s refusal to dismiss the Indictment."

But although he lost this battle, one that seldom is won in the courts, the real test has yet to be determined.

(esp)

November 13, 2008 in Prosecutions | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Senior Executive of Large Swiss Bank Indicted

A press release of the US Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida tells of the Indictment of "a senior executive of a large Swiss bank with offices worldwide, including the United States."  This individual "has been charged with conspiring with other executives, managers, private bankers and clients of the banking firm to defraud the United States."

The press release states that "according to the criminal indictment, between 2002 and 2007, [this individual] oversaw the Swiss bank’s cross-border private banking business that provided services to some 20,000 U.S. clients who reportedly concealed approximately $20 billion in assets from the IRS."

The Indictment only has one count and it is for conspiracy under section 371.

Indictment - Download Indictment.pdf

Wall Street Jrl Blog here

Southern District of Florida Blog, Exec UBS indicted in tax probe 

(esp)

November 13, 2008 in Prosecutions | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

In the News and Around the Blogosphere

Marisa McQuilken and Brian Katkin, Legal Times, The Name Game: Who's Going Where? - Washington insiders buzz about which lawyers will land in the Obama administration's top legal slots.

Lynnley Browning, New York Times, Indictments Said to Be Possible in UBS Inquiry

Corporate Crime Reporter, What Does it Take to Indict a Major American Corporation for Murder?

DOJ Press Release, Former Alaska Businessman Sentenced on Public Corruption Charges

DOJ Press Release, Miami Clinic Owner Sentenced to 30 Months in Prison for $10.9 Million Medicare Fraud

(esp)

November 13, 2008 in News | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

November 10, 2008

In the News and Around the Blogosphere

(esp)

November 10, 2008 in News | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

November 9, 2008

In the News & Around the Blogosphere

Instapundit, In The Hartford Courant, more on the Chris Dodd mortgage scandal

Tom Kirkendall, Houston ClearThinkers, The NatWest Three are finally going home

FCPA Blog, U.S. Law Firms Face China Bribery Probe

Dan Slater, WSJ Blog, What’s the Cost of Corporate Bribery? Siemens Sets Aside $1 Billion

Brian Krebs, Washington Post, Extortion Used in Prescription Data Breach - FBI Investigating Threat Against Express Scripts Customers

Press Release, Office of the Attorney General NY - Attorney General Cuomo Secures Guilty Plea from Home Improvement Contractors for Scamming Western New York Senior Our of More than $80,000

Anchorage Daily News (AP), Judge closes inquiry in Ohio corruption probe leak

(esp)

November 9, 2008 in News | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack