Saturday, September 27, 2008

Who Says White Collar Sentences Are Dropping Below the Guidelines?

Despite recent Supreme Court opinions that provide some flexibility when sentencing a convicted defendant, guideline sentences appear to be part of a culture that is not changing. A recent white collar case that demonstrates a court not departing below the guidelines, is the recent sentencing of T. Milton Street. A brother of former Philadelphia Mayor John F. Street, T. Milton Street received a sentence of 30 months for his convictions for tax charges. (see Emilie Lounsberry, Philadelphia Inquirer, T, Milton Street Sr. gets 30 months for dodging taxes) The trial was an unusual one, with the accused arguing the unconstitutionality of the tax code (see here).  The jury failed to convict the accused of the fraud charges brought by the government, and also did not convict of all the tax charges that had been brought. (see here).  In addition to the stiff tax sentence, the court failed to grant the accused bail pending his appeal. (see Michael Hinkelman, Philadelphia Inquirer, T. Milton Street Sentenced to 30 Months) This does not, however, preclude him from asking the appellate court for bail.

(esp)(w/ a hat tip to Peter Goldberger)

Sentencing, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Who Says White Collar Sentences Are Dropping Below the Guidelines?:


The headline of this post really doesn't match the body. Was this guy sentenced below the guidleline? ARE white collar sentences dropping below the guidline?

Posted by: DAG | Sep 27, 2008 3:47:14 PM

Post a comment