Monday, August 6, 2007

Rigas Talks

John Rigas, former Adelphia chair, has decided to talk. But unlike James Brown, former Adelphia's vice president of finance, Rigas' discussion is post-trial and offers no benefit to the soon-to-be incarcerated defendant.  Reporting on the conversation is Lesly Cauley of USA Today, who presents the words of this 82 year old man who is facing 15 years incarceration.

With such incredible consequences faced by defendants if they risk going to trial, it is not surprising to see that a key witness chooses to provide witness testimony to the government as opposed to being prosecuted as a target.    And with a civil action to compare the testimony of this witness to that provided in the criminal case, issues of truth can be examined.

But irrespective of what Rigas says or does, one still has to wonder whether such a crime deserves such a harsh penalty.  Should first offenders be sentenced to 15 and 20 years in prison?  Should a former CEO be given a sentence of life minus 3 months (he is entitled to be released when an MD certifies that he has less than 3 months to live).  Will all of this really deter others, especially when Rigas continues to maintain that his actions do not constitute crimes?  And do they constitute crimes, or was this an example of blaming the driver of a wrecked vehicle, irrespective of whether he or she caused the accident.

(esp)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2007/08/rigas-talks.html

Prosecutions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e3933705238834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rigas Talks:

Comments

With all the crimes in our corrupt nation that threaten the very lives of people, their ability to live safely and provide decent lives for their families - this "crime" should have been at the very bottom of the heap!
A stiff penalty/fine? Absolutely! Jail time? Ridiculous and totally out of porportion for the "crime".
Will others learn anything from this? Yes; I have learned that once again there is no blanket justice in this nation. It only depends on how it benefits those in control and in this case goverment needed an "example", so they took an old man, head of a decent family in a small, close knit community and through him in jail for 15 years!! How can we call that justice?

Posted by: local citzen | Aug 25, 2007 2:31:46 PM

Post a comment