Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Highlights from the Order on KPMG Defendants

Highlights from the opinion by Judge Lewis Kaplan:

  • "The Thompson Memorandum and the USAO pressure on KPMG to deny or cut off defendants'  attorneys' fees necessarily impinge upon the KPMG Defendants' ability to defend themselves."
  • "If the government means to take the payment of legal fees into account in making charging decisions only where the payments are part of an obstruction scheme - and thereby narrowly tailor its means to its ends- it would be easy enough to say so.  But that is not what the Thompson Memorandum says."
  • "The Thompson Memorandum discourages and, as a practical matter, often prevents companies from providing employees and former employees with the financial means to exercise their constitutional rights to defend themselves.  This is so even where companies obstruct nothing and, to the contrary, do everything within their power to make a clean breast of the facts to the government and to take responsibility for any offenses they may have committed.  It undermines the proper functioning of the adversary process that the Constitution adopted as the mode of determining guilt or innocence in criminal cases.  The actions of prosecutors who implement it can make matters even worse, as occurred here."
  • "[T]he government's interference in the KPMG Defendants' ability to mount a defense 'creates an appearance of impropriety that diminishes faith in the fairness of the criminal justice system in general.'"

The remedy is not a dismissal of the action, but rather:

"1. The Court declares that so much of the Thompson Memorandum and the activities of the USAO as threatened to take into account, in deciding whether to indict KPMG, whether KPMG would advance attorneys’ fees to present or former employees in the event they were indicted for activities undertaken in the course of their employment interfered with the rights of such employees to a fair trial and to the effective assistance of counsel and therefore violated the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution.

2. The government shall adhere to its representation that any payment by KPMG of the defense costs of the KPMG Defendants is acceptable to the government and will not be considered in determining whether KPMG has complied with the DPA or otherwise prejudice KPMG.

3. The Clerk shall open a civil docket number to accommodate the claims of the KPMG Defendants against KPMG for advancement of defense costs should they elect to pursue them. If they file a complaint within 14 days, the Clerk shall issue a summons to KPMG. The Court in that event will entertain the claims pursuant to its ancillary jurisdiction over this case.

The motions are denied insofar as they seek monetary sanctions against the government. The Court reserves decision as to whether to grant additional relief." (citations omitted)

(esp)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2006/06/highlights_from.html

Judicial Opinions, Legal Ethics, Privileges, Prosecutors | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8345cbbb569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Highlights from the Order on KPMG Defendants:

» The Thompson memo and ancillary jurisdiction from Appellate Law
WhiteCollarCrimeProfBlog points to Judge Lewis Kaplan's 83 page Order, in which he holds that 1) the Tompson memo is unconstitutional; 2) sovereign immunity bars an award of sanctions against the government (because there is no specific statute providi... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 27, 2006 8:57:30 AM

» The Thompson memo and ancillary jurisdiction from Appellate Law
WhiteCollarCrimeProfBlog points to Judge Lewis Kaplan's 83 page Order, in which he holds that 1) the Tompson memo is unconstitutional; 2) sovereign immunity bars an award of sanctions against the government (because there is no specific statute providi... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 27, 2006 9:12:07 AM

» Judge Rules That Prosecutors Violated the rights of 16 KPMG Partners from Zmetro.com
Peter Lattman:Those who commit crimes - regardless of whether they wear white or blue collars - must be brought to justice. The government, however, has let its zeal get in the way of its judgment. It has violated the Constitution... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 28, 2006 4:56:25 AM

» Judge Rules That Prosecutors Violated the rights of 16 KPMG Partners from Zmetro.com
Peter Lattman:Those who commit crimes - regardless of whether they wear white or blue collars - must be brought to justice. The government, however, has let its zeal get in the way of its judgment. It has violated the Constitution... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 28, 2006 8:06:45 AM

» Judge Rules That Prosecutors Violated the rights of 16 KPMG Partners from Zmetro.com
Peter Lattman:Those who commit crimes - regardless of whether they wear white or blue collars - must be brought to justice. The government, however, has let its zeal get in the way of its judgment. It has violated the Constitution... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 28, 2006 8:10:17 AM

» gottex swim wear sale from gottex swim wear sale . Jan Ringedal
Gottex swim wear sale ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 24, 2006 9:33:10 AM

Comments

Post a comment