Thursday, May 25, 2006

Lay and Skilling Convicted

The jury returned guilty verdicts on all counts against former Enron CEO Ken Lay and 19 of 28 counts for Jeffrey Skilling, with not guilty on 9 of the 10 insider trading counts.  The verdict came much more quickly than most expected, and U.S. District Judge Sim Lake also announced his decision convicting Lay on the bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution charges that were tried separately.  For those interested, the redacted version of the indictment given to the jury is available below.

With the conviction of the two defendants, the next two issues significant issues will be sentencing and the inevitable appeal.  The key to the sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines is the amount of the loss attributed to the defendant's crimes.  Although the Guidelines are now advisory, Judge Lake has shown in other cases that he will follow them fairly closely in determining the final sentence.  Under the fraud loss table in Sec. 2B1.1 in the 2000 Guidelines (here) that would apply to these offenses, a loss of more than $80 million would put them in range of a 6-7 year sentence, and additional enhancements for number of victims, sophisticated means, etc. could add enough points to put them in a 10-15 year range.  An interesting question is whether Judge Lake will apply the obstruction of justice enhancement by finding that one or both defendants committed perjury; in a case like this, the government is almost guaranteed to request that increase.  The defendants will argue that the loss was insignificant because the company's stock price was unaffected by their statements. Judge Lake also handled the trial and sentencing of Jamie Olis, and the Fifth Circuit required that he more carefully analyze the loss from his criminal conduct.  The Judge's decision on Olis likely will provide an outline to how he will approach the sentencing of Lay and Skilling on the loss issue.

I expect that a key appellate issue will be the "Ostrich Instruction" given to the jury on the issue of determining the defendant's intent (see earlier post here).  The use of this instruction usually is controversial, and the fact that the jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts for Lay and the non-insider trading counts for Skilling may actually help the defendants if the Fifth Circuit were to find the instruction should not have been given.  The lack of any not guilty verdicts related to the disclosure counts could show that the jurors were influenced by the Ostrich Instruction, which would blunt the government's harmless error argument.  (ph)

Download enron_redacted_indictment.pdf

Enron, Verdict | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lay and Skilling Convicted:

» Blog Verification from Blog Verification
184211 [Read More]

Tracked on May 25, 2006 11:10:54 AM

» Breakin rocks in the hot sun from Monty's Bluff
OK now everybody together I fought the law and the law won I fought the law and the law won Yup.  Skilling and Lay are going to prison.  I have no doubt both are deserving, but I cant say I expected this outcome.  Way back when all th... [Read More]

Tracked on May 26, 2006 6:44:02 AM

» Association business health insurance small from Association business health insurance small
Home owner car insurance State of wisconsin insurance commissioner New jersey health insurance plan [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 11, 2006 3:04:41 AM

» Non owned auto liability insurance from Non owned auto liability insurance
Make money from online Credit card companies raise minimum payments Neg am mortgage Cash advance in [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 16, 2006 11:20:24 AM

» Sample loan agreement from Sample loan agreement
General motors health insurance Finance & insurance Pacific care insurance Lloyds of london insurance<... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 19, 2006 11:18:28 PM

» Department credit cards from Department credit cards
Missouri insurance commissioner Texas hold em starting strategies Health insurance exam Casualty insuranc... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 20, 2006 7:38:17 PM


The government would still have the Reg U loan purpose charges against Lay and the one insider trading against Skilling.

Posted by: O. C. Jones | May 25, 2006 4:28:18 PM

Good to see justice finally being served. I have one observation/question: Jeff Skilling was senior partner at McKinsey & Company (top management consulting firm), which is probably the most powerful behind-the-scenes entity in the corporate world; he was the McKinsey guy in charge of the Enron account before he left to join Enron.

McKinsey is full of incredibly smart out-of-the-box thinkers and I wonder if anyone at McKinsey was involved in devising some of the ingenious (albeit illegal) schemes at Enron and why this question has never been asked...

Posted by: RichieRich | May 25, 2006 5:36:49 PM

We should not eschew the Rico-type nicknames in this more modern era:
Weissman of Enron's Task Force convicted NY's Vincent "The Chin" Gigante.

Now he will forever be the guy who put away Kenneth "Kenny Boy" Lay.
As time goes on we'll know much even more of Richard "Dough Boy" Causey.
And of California DeathStar/Richochet schemer Jeffrey "Fat Boy" Richter.

Posted by: | May 25, 2006 8:32:05 PM

I was curious, is there any speculation of a Presidential pardon say after the congressional elections.

Posted by: Ron | May 27, 2006 11:02:46 AM

Hi ! Your site is very interesting. Thank you.

Posted by: Hakee | Jun 13, 2006 12:47:23 AM

Post a comment