Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Round Two of the Scrushy Prosecution

The second criminal prosecution of former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy is getting ready to launch, unless he can succeed in having the indictment thrown out because the pool of potential grand jurors did not include a sufficient number of African-Americans.  Scrushy was indicted in 2005 along with former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman and two former Siegelman aides on corruption charges.  The case is set to go to trial in Montgomery, the state capital which is in the Middle District of Alabama, at the end of April.  Scrushy and the other defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the indictment because the District has a 30% African-American population but the jury pool is less than that figure, although a government witness testified that African-Americans made up 21% of the pool, which meets the requirements of federal law.  Even if Scrushy does not win this motion -- and it is very difficult to establish such a violation for grand jury selection -- he can still challenge the pool of jurors available for selection to the petit jury, although a Sixth Amendment claim would also be very difficult to win because Supreme Court precedent does not require that the actual jury reflect the racial or ethnic composition of the District.  An AP story (here) discusses the hearing on Scrushy's challenge to the indictment.

On an related topic, Scrushy recently began running his television program Viewpoint in Montgomery.  The program features a number of local ministers, and began running in Birmingham in 2004 around the time he was indicted there on fraud charges related to HealthSouth.  Scrushy denies that there is any connection between the location of the next prosecution, assuming it survives the motion to dismiss, and the decision to run the show in  Montgomery.  Instead, it is part of a plan to roll out the program on a national basis, as noted in a Birmingham News story (here).  Surely it is just a coincidence, although I doubt American Idol is particularly worried about its ratings. (ph)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2006/04/round_two_of_th.html

Corruption, Grand Jury, Prosecutions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83425573853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Round Two of the Scrushy Prosecution:

» Jury Selection Begins in Corruption Trial of Scrushy and Former Gov. Siegelman from White Collar Crime Prof Blog
Jury selection began in the corruption trial of former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy, former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman, and two former members of Siegelman's cabinet. The judge expects to complete jury selection in two days, and then begin the t... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 20, 2006 3:17:21 AM

Comments

Professor Henning,

Would you please reference the federal rule or guideline requiring a particular percentage of a drawn jury pool to correspond to the community population percentage based on race or gender. It almost sounds as if you are referring to an alleged Batson violation, but Batson refers to preemptory challenges exercised in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. What is the legal basis of defendant's motion in this case related to number of African-Americans in the jury pool?

Thank you.

Posted by: DJ | Apr 16, 2006 1:20:54 PM

The issue arises under the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968.

Posted by: Peter Henning | Apr 16, 2006 1:37:08 PM

Post a comment