Wednesday, June 8, 2005

Wire Fraud Requires Interstate Transmission

18 U.S.C. s 1343 seems clear - - wire fraud requires an interstate transmission.  The government, however, recently argued that all you need is an "instrument of an integrated system of interstate commerce."   If this approach were taken, would all state phone calls become subject to the wire fraud statute, even if intrastate? 

A U.S. District Court in Mass. rejected this government stretching of the wire fraud statute, and today dismissed the wire fraud convictions in a case handled by Atty. David Hoose.   Judge D.J Ponsor supported this dismissal on three grounds, including the plain language of the statute.

See order here Download order_granting_rule_29_on_wire_fraud.pdf

(esp)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2005/06/wire_fraud_requ.html

Fraud | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83422ec9253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wire Fraud Requires Interstate Transmission:

» Statutory Federalism: from The Volokh Conspiracy
Although Gonzales v. Raich doesn't offer much hope for meaningful constitutional limits on the scope of federal power under the Commerce Clause, a recent case... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 14, 2005 9:13:18 AM