Tuesday, August 16, 2016
A team of law professors is hoping to encourage more trusts and estates programming at the Southeastern Association of Law Schools conference, which will be held from July 30-Aug. 6, 2017, in Boca Raton. The team will be proposing two discussion groups, described below, one which focuses on pedagogy and one on scholarship; please let them know if you would like to participate. In addition, please feel free to propose a panel or discussion group yourself; here is the submission information, http://www.sealslawschools.org/submissions/.
Thank you! If you have any questions, then please contact Naomi Cahn at firstname.lastname@example.org.
SEALS T and E Resource Team: Mark Bauer, Naomi Cahn, and Karen Sneddon.
PROPOSED DISCUSSION GROUPS
Many trusts and estates courses have historically focused their teaching techniques on the traditional Socratic method, and much of trusts and estates scholarship has focused on the development of doctrine within the field itself. This half day of programming will include two plenary discussion groups that explore pedagogy and scholarship that are expanding the ways of teaching and studying trusts and estates, and related doctrines. The additional discussion groups will address 1) innovations in teaching, including both skills and doctrine; 2) new research that uses trusts and estates concept in other areas of the law, including Elder Law, Family Law, Property, and Professional Responsibility.
Monday, April 18, 2016
The Central States Law Schools Association 2016 Scholarship Conference will be held on Friday, September 23 and Saturday, September 24, 2016 at the University of North Dakota School of Law in Grand Forks, ND.
CSLSA is an organization of law schools dedicated to providing a forum for conversation and collaboration among law school academics. The CSLSA Annual Conference is an opportunity for legal scholars, especially more junior scholars, to present working papers or finished articles on any law-related topic in a relaxed and supportive setting where junior and senior scholars from various disciplines are available to comment. More mature scholars have an opportunity to test new ideas in a less formal setting than is generally available for their work. Scholars from member and nonmember schools are invited to attend.
Registration will formally open in July. Hotel rooms are already available, and more information about the CSLSA conference can be found on our website at www.cslsa.us.
Saturday, April 9, 2016
College is getting more expensive and coming up with the money to pay tuition costs can be a difficult. This article discusses some of the different option that people have for paying college tuition costs. Students will often need to scrape together family savings, work study loans, financial aid, grants, and scholarships. It is also common for Universities to offer some sort of tuition payment plan. This article also explains how people can spend money on tuition from 529 accounts. According to this article a family that has the money should try paying for tuition up front to avoid having to take out a loan. People could also consider spending from a retirement account like a 401(k), though there are risks involved with this approach. It might be a good idea to meet with a financial adviser to discuss different options for paying tuition costs.
See Beth Pinsker, It takes a village of options to pay college tuition, Reuters, April 7, 2016.
Special thanks to Jim Hillhouse for bringing this article to my attention.
Thursday, February 4, 2016
The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project seeks contributors of rewritten judicial opinions and commentary on those opinions for an edited collection entitled Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions. This edited volume, to be published by Cambridge University Press, is part of a collaborative project among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions. The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, and Bridget J. Crawford, will be published in 2016 by Cambridge University Press. (That book’s Introduction and Table of Contents are available here.) Subsequent volumes in the series will focus on different courts or different subject matters. This call is for contributions to a volume of tax decisions rewritten from a feminist perspective.
Tax volume editors Bridget Crawford and Anthony Infanti seek prospective authors for 8 to 10 rewritten tax-related opinions covering a range of topics. Authors are welcome to suggest cases of their own choosing or to consult the editors or others for ideas. All tax-related cases are appropriate for rewriting. Possible cases from U.S. courts are listed here, but that is not an exhaustive list. Cases may come from any jurisdiction and any court, including non-U.S. jurisdictions. The volume editors conceive of feminism as a broad movement concerned with justice and equality, and welcome proposals to rewrite cases in a way that bring into focus issues such as gender, race, class, disability, sexual orientation, national origin, and immigration status.
As the core of the Feminist Judgments Project is judicial opinions, proposals must be either to (1) rewrite a case (not administrative guidance, regulations, etc.) or (2) comment on a rewritten case. Rewritten opinions may be re-imagined majority opinions, dissents, or concurrences, as appropriate to the court. Feminist judgment writers will be bound by law and precedent in effect at the time of the original decision (with a 10,000 word maximum for the rewritten judgment). Commentators will explain the original court decision, how the feminist judgment differs from the original judgment, and what difference the feminist judgment might have made (4,000 word maximum for the commentary). Commentators and opinions writers who wish to work together are welcome to indicate that in the application.
In suggesting possible cases for rewriting, the volume editors have had the input and advice of an Advisory Panel of distinguished U.S. scholars including Alice Abreu (Temple), Patricia Cain (Santa Clara), Joseph Dodge (Florida State), Mary Louise Fellows (Minnesota), Wendy Gerzog (Baltimore), Steve Johnson (Florida State), Marjorie Kornhauser (Tulane), Ajay Mehrotra (American Bar Foundation, Northwestern), Beverly Moran (Vanderbilt), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke), Nancy Shurtz (Oregon), Nancy Staudt (Washington University), and Lawrence Zelenak (Duke).
The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project approaches revised judicial opinion writing as a form of critical socio-legal scholarship. There are several world-wide projects engaged in similar efforts, including the U.K.-based Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (2010); Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law (2014); the Women’s Court of Canada; ongoing projects in Ireland, New Zealand, and a pan-European project; and other U.S.-based projects currently under way.
Those who are interested in rewriting an opinion or providing the commentary on one of the rewritten tax cases should fill out an application here.
Applications are due by February 29, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. eastern. Editors expect to notify accepted authors and commentators by April 15, 2016. First drafts of rewritten opinions will be due on August 15, 2016. First drafts of commentary will be due on September 15, 2016.
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Mary Ann Case (Professor, University of Chicago School of Law) recently published an article entitled, When someday is today: carrying forward the history of old age and inheritance into the age of Medicaid, 40 Law & Soc. Inquiry 499-505 (2015). Provided below is an abstract of the article:
This review essay of Hendrik Hartog's Someday All This Will Be Yours undertakes a brief overview of some of the massive changes in middle-class planning for old age and inheritance in the United States over the course of the past century, focusing on the increased role of the state as a source of funding and regulation, the rise of the elder law bar, and the resulting new tools and motives for the transfer of property in exchange for care in the age of Medicaid.
Saturday, August 1, 2015
The Estate Planning & Community Property Law Journal (EPJ) at the Texas Tech University School of Law is seeking traditional law review articles for Volume 8.
The EPJ is the only law school published legal journal of its kind committed to community property law, and is only the second in the nation devoted to estate planning. The EPJ is host to some of the most highly regarded scholars and practitioners in the field of estate planning and community property law. In fact, Professor Bryan Camp’s article entitled “Protecting Trust Assets from the Federal Tax Lien,” was selected as the Texas Bar Foundation’s Outstanding Law Review Article for 2009.
This is your chance to join the EPJ in advancing legal scholarship, providing thought-provoking commentary and guiding practitioners in the field by publishing the finest articles written both nationally and internationally! If you have an article you would like considered for publication please email the EPJ a copy along with your resume at email@example.com.
Friday, July 24, 2015
The following is posted as a courtesy to Prof. Cynthia D. Bond of the John Marshall Law School:
Greetings Law Teacher Colleagues:
I am working on an article this summer on uses of popular culture in the law school classroom. I am defining popular culture broadly to include mass culture texts like movies, TV shows, popular music, images which circulate on the internet, etc, and also any current events that you may reference in the classroom which are not purely legal in nature (i.e. not simply a recent court decision).
To support this article, I am doing a rather unscientific survey to get a sense of what law professors are doing in this area. If you are a law professor and you use popular culture in your class, I would be most grateful if you could answer this quick, anonymous survey I have put together:
Thanks in advance for your time and have a wonderful rest of summer!
The John Marshall Law School
Thursday, May 14, 2015
After three long years of research, interviews, and design, LastingMatters launched in May of 2014. Barbara Bates Sedoric, President and Founder of LastingMatters, has been recognized as a Distinguished Professional in Estate and Legacy Planning through the National Association of Distinguished Professionals.
“The LastingMatters Organizer,” is a comprehensive guide that enables adults to compile, organize, and document important personal information, intentions and wishes. “My mother’s sudden death, combined with my career in estates and trusts inspired me to develop a comprehensive guide that could help any adult, at any age, reduce the costs, time, stress, and family tensions associated with the death of a loved one,” Barbara Sedoric said about the formation of her business. Barbara Sedoric’s acute attention to detail, strong organizational skills, and ability to work with families after the death of a loved one have made her organization the success that it is today.
See National Association of Distinguished Professionals Selects Barbara Bates Sedoric As A Distinguished Professional In Her Field, Blackbird PR News, May 14, 2015.
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
Vice President for Academic Affairs Paul Zeleza says, “Faculty scholarship and teaching are synergistic, and when combined with faculty-student research, it benefits students’ learning immensely. The faculty whose scholarly accomplishments we celebrated admirably model the life of the teacher-scholar which we cherish as a university.”
See University Presents Scholar Awards to Four Faculty Members, Quinnipiac University, Apr. 10, 2015.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
The Journal features traditional law review articles related to probate topics, as well as complete full-text opinions from important probate court cases. The Journal also publishes shorter Essays as well as "Perspectives" in conjunction with printed probate court opinions. A "Perspective" piece is intended to be an extremely brief (1,000-2,000 word) article which will place a judicial opinion in context and summarize its significance.
In addition, the Journal particularly encourages the submission of noteworthy court opinions by both presiding judges and practitioners.
All potential authors are requested to follow the latest versions of A Uniform System of Citation, most commonly called the Bluebook, published by the Harvard Law Review Association. Any articles submitted by e-mail are requested to be in Microsoft Word format.
For questions regarding submission of articles or opinions, please contact the Editor-in-Chief, Lauren MacDonald, at (203) 582-3223, or by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org. Articles and opinions may be submitted by e-mail to email@example.com. Also, all article/opinion submissions can be addressed to: Editor-in-Chief, Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, Quinnipiac University School of Law, 275 Mount Carmel Avenue, Hamden, CT 06518-1952.