Friday, January 30, 2015
The ABA Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law is presenting the second of ten webinars for the professional development series entitled, From Undertaker to Litigator and Steps in Between: The Role of the Paralegal in Estate Administration, Distribution and Resolution.
The upcoming webinar entitled, Immediate Post-Mortem Estate Planning will cover the topics of appointment of a fiduciary, fiduciary considerations, immediate steps to take postappointment, post-mortem estate planning considerations, disclaimers, and more. Thursday, February 12, 2015, 12:30 PM - 01:30 PM CT. Here is why you should attend:
The ABA Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law is proud to continue our professional development series focused on paralegals, legal assistants, and others working in the areas of Trust & Estate Law, with the 2015 program: From Undertaker to Litigator and Steps in Between: The Role of the Paralegal in Estate Administration, Distribution and Resolution.
Attendees of the Paralegal eLearning Program will learn substantive legal and ethics issues, as well as best practices, from leading industry professionals with in-depth knowledge and hands-on experience in Trust & Estate Law.
The proposal by President Obama to eliminate step-up basis has not stopped supporters of repealing the estate tax. Proponents of estate tax repeal point out that fewer than 5,000 taxable estate tax returns were filed in 2013, which is lower than 1% of deceased individuals. Multiple financial planners have expressed the belief that Obama's proposals on capital gains taxes was a preemptive strike against bills that would repeal the estate tax by putting a bargaining chip on the table.
See Bloomberg BNA, Potential for Estate Tax Repeal Grows Despite New Obama Capital Gains Proposal,Daily Tax Report, Jan. 26, 2015.
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Over the past generation, many talented people have tried to transform capitalism by using the market to solve social problems. These people have created organizations that are part profit-oriented and part purpose-oriented.
Ben & Jerry’s ice cream led the first wave in this sector of companies, but now there is a burgeoning array of social-capitalist tool s to address problems—raging from B Corporations to social impact bonds.
Impact investing is probably the most promising of these tools. Impact investors seek out companies that are intentionally designed both to make a profit and provide a measurable and accountable social good. Impact funds are frequently willing to accept lower financial returns for the sake of doing good.
While there are many roadblocks to impact investing, it is now entering the mainstream as new impact funds are being created. Although impact investing will not replace government or be a panacea, it is one way to address social problems. If you want to leave a mark on the world, find a way to get involved in a socially useful investment proposition.
See David Brooks, How To Leave A Mark, The New York Times, Jan. 27, 2015.
Special thanks to Joel Dobris (Professor of Law, UC Davis School of Law) for bringing this article to my attention.
Unlike other living creatures on this earth, humans treat dying as a solemn rite of passage. Many of us bury our dead with a ceremony, and many of us believe in an afterlife.
This idea is reflected upon in the Green Cemetery Initiative, a nonprofit trust in rural central Massachusetts. The main idea motivating the Green Cemetery Initiative is that instead of caring so much about preserving our own dead bodies, why not care more about preserving the natural environment—“the unspoiled beauty of God’s creation.” According to the Green Burial of Massachusetts, a partner with the trust, “Each year we bury approximately 827,060 gallons of toxic embalming fluid, 104,272 tons of steel, 2,700 tons of copper and bronze, 30-plus million board feet of hardwood, and 1,636 tons of reinforced concrete.”
The key feature of the initiative is that the deceased would be buried in biodegradable coffins, without embalming fluids and concrete fortresses. Engraved organic flagstones would serve as grave markers.
See Michael Guillen, Final Gestures, U.S. News & World Report, Jan. 28, 2015.
After two sisters were given £100,000 following their father’s death, they are being forced to pay it all back when the insurance company sent them the wrong man’s money.
Elaine Briscoe and Sandy Millington received the six-figure check after a three-year battle to track down the missing pension of Rob Gent. Immediately, the sisters split £40,000 between their four children and spent £20,000 more.
Within a month after receiving the check, Friends Life said the sisters were given a pension belonging to another customer with the same name. The pensions and insurance companies subsequently threatened the sisters with legal action unless they gave it all back.
The pair was forced to sell their father’s house in an effort to repay the money they had spent. They also had to borrow from friends and other relatives to make up the full amount including interest.
See SWNS Reporter, Sisters Given £100k Life Insurance for Father’s Death Told to Pay It ALL BACK After Getting the WRONG Man’s Money, SWNS.com, Jan. 29, 2015.
The American Bar Association Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law is holding a CLE entitled, Gift Tax Returns: A 30,000-Foot Overview, on February 17th from 1:00-2:30 PM ET via webinar. Here is why you should attend:
With gift tax return filing season in full swing, it is important to consider what happens after the ink dries on the gift tax return.
This program provides an overview of important issues to consider when making and reporting taxable gifts of hard-to-value assets, and how to handle an audit of a gift tax return.
Topics our panelists will cover include:
- Planning for an eventual audit at the gift-giving stage (including IRS challenges to gifts of interests in closely-held entities);
- Reporting complicated transactions on gift tax returns (including working with appraisers and complying with adequate disclosure rules); and
- Defending the gift tax return when the audit letter arrives (including classifying issues, privilege, discovery, settlement, and litigation).
The sudden and unexpected death of Glee star Cory Monteith provides an example of the importance of young adults not putting off estate planning, especially having a will. Resolution of Monteith's estate was delayed for a year-and-a-half due to complications over whether an exception was warranted to the general intestate rule that his parents would inherit from his $810,000 estate equally. The issue is seemingly resolved by his father stating that he does not wish to inherit anything from his son's estate, but not before he signed a document that stated he did not have communication with his son for many years and did not pay child support. Monteith's father later claimed that he did not know what the document said and that it was untrue. If Monteith had a will, the public blame game and finger pointing by his parents, who each accused each other for his father's absence in his life and argued over whether that attributed to the young star's death, may have been avoided.
See Danielle Mayoras & Andy Mayoras, Cory Monteith Shows How Even Young Adults Need Wills, Forbes, Jan. 28, 2015.
After the death of her mother, Kathleen Kozinski, who was named as both trustee of a trust created by her mother and personal representative of her mother's estate, filed a notice of trust and a petition for administration of the estate in two separate actions, which were then consolidated. Two beneficiaries filed a petition for review of Kozinski's compensation as trustee and representative, but did not name or serve her personally.
In Kozinski v. Stabenow, a Florida appellate court held that Kozinski should have been served in her individual capacity and reversed the trial court's denial of her motion to dismiss.
See Luke Lantta, Representative Versus Individual Capacity: It Can Make A Difference, Bryan Cave, Jan. 28, 2015.
Special thanks to Brian Cohan (Attorney at Law, Law Offices of Brian J. Cohan, P.C.) for bringing this article to my attention.
Trust beneficiaries have brought suit against UBS Financial Services alleging that the company mismanaged trust funds, which was a breach of fiduciary duty. The beneficiaries are seeking a judgment of $4.5 million. One beneficiary bringing suit is Sanchez Carmona, who claims that in addition to mismanagement of the trust the company also failed to notify her that she was a beneficiary of the trust after her husband died in 2003, falsely listed her husband as a resident of Puerto Rico, and claimed in a 2010 government filing that he was still alive.
See Brian Mahany, UBS Financial Services Accused of Trust Fraud, The National law Review, Jan. 28, 2015.
Special thanks to Jim Hillhouse (Professional Legal Marketing (PLM, Inc.)) for bringing this article to my attention.
David Tate (San Francisco/California litigation attorney) created a video entitled, Mandated Elder & Dependent Adult Abuse Reporting – Then What’s Next – Community Response. In the three -minute video, Tate describes what happens after elder abuse is reported to state agencies and what the reporter of abuse should and must do under California mandatory reporting laws. Tate suggests three areas of improvement to help reduce elder abuse:
- additional resources
- education and awareness
- better developed and coordinated community response