« Pabst Blue Ribbon Casket | Main | 'Tis the Marriage (and Pre-nup) Season »

May 5, 2008

Even with proper documents, an agent may have trouble handling principal's affairs

Having all of the proper disability planning for property management documents in proper form (e.g., a durable power of attorney) may not be enough for an agent to handle the principal's business in an efficient manner.

Here are some excerpts from Molly Selvin, Cashing out an elderly parent's IRA -- in just 9 visits to the bank, LA Times, May 4, 2008, which describes some of the problems:

Over three months last winter, [Agent] made nine trips to the bank. Sometimes I accompanied him. He spoke with several "customer solutions representatives." He produced his dad's durable power of attorney and living trust for inspection multiple times. Those documents were repeatedly faxed to the bank's central legal department for further examination. Hard copies were then sent by corporate courier to the bank's IRA department -- and disappeared.

Bank of America's employees were unfailingly polite and eager to help. But depending on the day and the person, [Agent] was told that [Principal's] legal papers were in order. Or that they weren't. He was told that, notwithstanding [Principal's] wishes, bank policy bars adult children from managing their parent's individual retirement accounts. Or that it doesn't. * * *

[Agent] eventually prevailed, in large measure because he was persistent. * * *'

The experience was a cautionary tale for other baby boomers who may soon be in charge of their elderly parents' affairs: Holding a durable power of attorney may be only the first step. You may have to fight to enforce it.

May 5, 2008 in Disability Planning - Property Management | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/89778/28779830

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Even with proper documents, an agent may have trouble handling principal's affairs:

Comments

As an in-house counsel at a financial institution, I would note that most agents do not understand the paperwork they have. In this case based solely on he news article (for what that's worth), the trust documents are useless legally when dealing with an INDIVIDUAL retirement account unless the person is deceased and named the trust as the account beneficiary. Do you really think most people can understand this distinction on their parent's accounts that they never set up and may never have known existed before taking ont he role of agent (and by the way never read the account agreements)? I know the answer from experience is no.

All these planning tools are fine, but if the people who are being sold them and who have to implement them don't understand them, why should the financial institution be the sole entity that has the responsibility to explain it to them - isn'y that the unauthorized practice of law? And when the agent does not like the answer, is it ALWAYS the financial institution's fault the agent does not like the reality? This LA Times article does little to help the real world dilemma agents and financial institutions really have to deal with every day.

Posted by: Peter | May 6, 2008 9:48:06 AM

Post a comment