« Disclaimer may not defeat worker’s compensation insurer’s subrogation right | Main | Attorney Resigns for Bad Behavior as Agent »
April 15, 2008
Knight Analyzed
Helen Gunnarsson (Highland Park, Illinois) has recently published her article entitled Supremes limit trusts' ability to subtract investment-advice costs, 96 Ill. B.J. 123 (2008), in which she explains how SCOTUS held that "trusts are subject to a two-percent floor for subtracting advisory fees from their taxable income" in Knight v. Commissioner, 128 S. Ct. 782 (2008).
Ms. Gunnarsson concludes that:
After Knight, lawyers will have to consider carefully whether and to what extent they may have advised their trust and estate clients on a matter related to an investment - which could be as mundane as advising the trustee or executor on hiring someone to cut the grass on a piece of real estate owned by a trust or estate - to determine to what extent their fees are fully deductible to their clients * * *.
April 15, 2008 in Articles, Income Tax, Trusts | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/89778/28146164
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Knight Analyzed:
Comments
Please forgive me for multiple posts. This story has "just" really bugged me.
I'd like to hear from the law profs who hang out here: "So, what is a person to do in order to protect him- or herself from this kind of criminal abuse by an attorney?"
Thanks!
Posted by: John Holzmann | Apr 15, 2008 10:35:25 PM






