TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Univ. School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, October 28, 2013

Goldberg Reviews "Tort As A Substitute for Revenge"

Over at JOTWELL,  John Goldberg has a review of  "Tort as A Substitute for Revenge," by  Scott Hershovitz:

Modern tort theory begins with Holmes, who was eager to recast the old law of ‘trespass’ on suitably modern terms. Back when people were superstitious and quick to blame, tort could be understood as law that provides an alternative to vengeance. In our disenchanted world, however, tort law must be seen as a mechanism by which the state pursues a public policy, such as compensation of injury victims.

In Tort as a Substitute for Revenge, Professor Scott Hershovitz invites us to ask whether Holmes got us off on the wrong foot. Indeed, he argues that tort law has an important connection to revenge and that, as such, it is to be credited with delivering a kind of justice.

- SBS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2013/10/goldberg-reviews-tort-as-a-substitute-for-revenge.html

Scholarship, TortsProfs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019b00643207970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Goldberg Reviews "Tort As A Substitute for Revenge":

Comments

Post a comment