Friday, December 21, 2012
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Nora Freeman Engstrom is an Associate Professor at Stanford Law
School. Professor Engstrom’s scholarship lies at the intersection of
tort law and professional ethics, and her current work explores the
day-to-day operation of the tort system and particularly the tort
system’s interaction with alternative compensation mechanisms, such as
workers’ compensation and no-fault automobile insurance. Professor
Engstrom has also written extensively on attorney advertising and law
firms she calls “settlement mills”—high-volume personal injury law
practices that heavily advertise and mass-produce the resolution of
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Kip Viscusi & Joni Hersch (Vanderbilt) have posted to SSRN Assessing the Insurance Role of Tort After Calabresi. The abstract provides:
Calabresi’s theory of tort liability (1961) as a risk distribution mechanism established
insurance as an objective of tort liability. Calabresi’s risk-spreading concept
of tort has provided the impetus for much of the subsequent development of tort
liability, including risk-utility analysis and strict liability. Calabresi’s
analysis remains a powerful basis for modern tort liability. However, punitive
damages, noneconomic damages, shifts in liability rules over time, high
transactions costs, correlated risks, catastrophic losses, and mass toxic torts
pose challenges for the viability of tort liability as an insurance mechanism.
Despite limitations of tort liability as insurance, tort compensation also
serves a deterrence role. Tort liability retains a valuable insurance function
in many situations and may be superior to alternative institutional mechanisms
in fostering incentives.
Monday, December 17, 2012
The Legal Intelligencer reports that Gary Schultz, a former Penn State administrator now facing criminal charges, "has filed a praecipe for writ of summons against the university's former general counsel, Cynthia Baldwin, indicating he intends to sue her for legal malpractice." According to the article, at least two Penn State employees testified before the grand jury believing Baldwin was there as their lawyer. Baldwin, however, asserts that she was representing the university, not the employees, but "she did not think it was "appropriate" to interrupt the proceedings and clarify."
The full story requires free registration.
Thanks to Lisa Smith-Butler for the alert.