Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Goldberg & Sitkoff: Abolish Wrongful Interference with Inheritance

John Goldberg & Robert Sitkoff (Harvard) have posted to SSRN Torts and Estates:  Remedying Wrongful Interference with Inheritance.  The abstract provides:

This paper examines the nature, origin, and policy soundness of the tort of interference with inheritance. We conclude that the tort should be repudiated because it is conceptually and practically un-sound. Endorsed by the Restatement (Second) of Torts and recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in a recent decision, the tort has been adopted by the courts of nearly half the states. But the tort is deeply problematic from the perspectives of both inheritance law and tort law. It undermines the core principle of freedom of disposition that undergirds all of American inheritance law. It invites circumvention of principled policies encoded in the specialized rules of procedure applicable in inheritance disputes. In many cases, it has displaced venerable and better fitting causes of action for equitable relief. It has a derivative structure that violates the settled principle that torts identify and vindicate rights personal to the plaintiff. We conclude that the emergence of the interference-with-inheritance tort is symptomatic of two related and unhealthy tendencies in modern legal thought: the forgetting of restitution and equitable remedies, and the treatment of tort as a shapeless perversion of equity to provide compensation for, or de-terrence of, harmful antisocial conduct.

--CJR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2012/08/goldberg-sitkoff-abolish-wrongful-interference-with-inheritance.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017616c927f6970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Goldberg & Sitkoff: Abolish Wrongful Interference with Inheritance:

Comments

Post a comment