TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Commonwealth Law School

Friday, July 6, 2012

Kendrick on the Relationship Between Chilling Effect and Speaker's Intent

Leslie Kendrick (UVa) has posted to SSRN Speech, Intent, and the Chilling Effect.  The abstract provides:

In First Amendment doctrine, the “chilling effect” is often invoked as an objection to an otherwise legitimate rule that has the incidental effect of over-deterring protected speech. Although applications of the chilling effect are pervasive in cases involving the freedom of speech, they have received surprisingly little attention.

This Article focuses specifically on the use of chilling effect arguments to explain the role of speaker’s intent in protecting free speech. Speaker intent requirements, such as the “actual malice” standard for defamation, are common features of First Amendment law, and the chilling effect has been the primary doctrinal and normative explanation for their presence. This Article argues that the chilling effect is an unsatisfactory justification for such requirements. Moreover, the failure of the chilling effect to account for important aspects of free speech doctrine ought to raise more general concerns about the use of deterrence-based arguments in constitutional law.

Via Solum/LTB.


| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kendrick on the Relationship Between Chilling Effect and Speaker's Intent:


Post a comment