Monday, February 6, 2012

Hylton on Zipursky on the "New Private Law"

Keith Hylton (Boston University) has posted to SSRN New Private Law Theory and Tort Law:  A Comment.  The abstract provides:

This comment was prepared for the Harvard Law Review symposium on “The New Private Law,” as a response to Benjamin Zipursky’s principal paper on torts. I find Zipursky’s reliance on Cardozo’s Palsgraf opinion as a foundational source of tort theory troubling, for two reasons. First, Cardozo fails to offer a consistent theoretical framework for tort law in his opinions, many of which are difficult to reconcile with one another. Second, Palsgraf should be understood as an effort by Cardozo to provide greater predictability, within a special class of proximate cause cases, by reallocating decision-making power from juries to judges. It was almost surely not an effort to set out a nonconsequentialist theory of tort law. While I agree with some of the goals of the new private law movement, much work remains to be done, within the methodological approach championed by Zipursky, in constructing a rigorous theoretical framework.

--CJR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2012/02/hylton-on-zipursky-on-the-new-private-law.html

Conferences, Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef016761cf36c1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hylton on Zipursky on the "New Private Law":

Comments

Post a comment