Friday, January 20, 2012

Burger King, Spit, and Emotional Damages in Products Liability

A suit over a burger, spat upon by an employee of Burger King, resulted in the Ninth Circuit certifying a question to the Washington Supreme Court.  Plaintiff developed an uneasy feeling after receiving a Whopper with cheese.  When he lifted the bun, he saw a "slimy, clear and white phlegm glob" on the burger.  The glob was tested and was a DNA match with one of Burger King's employees, who pled guilty to felony assault.  Plaintiff claims ongoing emotional distress.  The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to Burger King.  On appeal, the Ninth Circuit certified the following question:  “Does the Washington Product Liability Act permit relief for the emotional distress damages, in the absence of physical injury, caused to the direct purchaser by being served and touching, but not consuming, a contaminated food product?”
The case is available here.  (Link has been fixed)
Thanks to Susan Raeker-Jordan for the tip.
--CJR



http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2012/01/burger-king-spit-and-emotional-damages-in-products-liability.html

Food and Drink, Products Liability | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0162ffe7e1ee970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Burger King, Spit, and Emotional Damages in Products Liability:

Comments

Post a comment