Monday, December 26, 2011

Omitting Claim for Economic Damages Pays Off - $10M Verdict in Segway Fall Case

The Connecticut Law Tribune reports on an interesting trial strategy in a Segway fall case:

In the case of former Southern Connecticut University student John Ezzo, [Robert B.] Adelman and his partner, Neil Sutton, decided to take a calculated risk. They omitted any claim for treatment costs, lost income or future earnings.

Instead, they only focused on the pain and suffering “non-economic” damages, and the alleged recklessness of Segway Inc., the maker of two-wheeled, scooter-like vehicles that carry riders in an upright position.

The focus on non-economic factors paid off handsomely, in the form of a $10 million verdict on Dec. 14. The jury found Segway acted recklessly when its employees failed to provide Ezzo with a helmet during a test drive. “It’s a unique, almost never-seen-before strategy,” said a lawyer for Segway, which is currently attempting to get the verdict reduced or thrown out.

Thanks to Lisa Smith-Butler for the alert.

- SBS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2011/12/omitting-claim-for-economic-damages-pays-off-10m-verdict-in-segway-fall-case.html

Current Affairs, Products Liability | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01675f2aeb2d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Omitting Claim for Economic Damages Pays Off - $10M Verdict in Segway Fall Case:

Comments

Post a comment