July 22, 2010
Stucke on Monopolist's Deception
Maurice Stucke (Tennessee) has posted to SSRN When a Monopolist Deceives. The abstract provides:
This essay uses one context - a monopolist’s deceptive advertising or product disparagement - to illustrate how competition authorities and courts should evaluate a monopolist’s deception under the federal antitrust laws. Competition authorities should target a monopolist’s anticompetitive deception, which courts should treat as a prima facie violation of the Sherman Act without requiring a full-blown rule of reason analysis or an arbitrary, multi-factor standard.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Stucke on Monopolist's Deception: