TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Univ. School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Erichson & Zipursky on Mass Torts

Howard Erichson (Fordham/Mass Tort Profs) and Benjamin Zipursky (Fordham) have posted to SSRN Consent Versus Closure.  The abstract provides:

Claimants, defendants, courts, and counsel are understandably frustrated by the difficulty of resolving mass tort cases. Defendants demand closure, but class certification has proved elusive and non-class settlements require individual consent. Lawyers and scholars have been drawn to strategies that solve the problem by empowering plaintiffs’ counsel to negotiate package deals that effectively sidestep individual consent. In the massive Vioxx settlement, the parties achieved closure by including terms that made it unrealistic for any claimant to decline. The American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation offers another path to closure: it proposes to permit clients to consent in advance to be bound by a settlement with a supermajority vote. This article argues that, despite their appeal, both of these strategies must be rejected. Lawyer empowerment strategies render settlements illegitimate when they rely on inauthentic consent or place lawyers in the untenable position of allocating funds among bound clients. Consent, not closure, is the touchstone of legitimacy in mass tort settlements.

For more, see Erichson's post at Mass Tort Profs.

--CJR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2010/03/erichson-zipursky-on-mass-torts.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a8ed5aab970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Erichson & Zipursky on Mass Torts:

Comments

Post a comment