December 15, 2008
New Hampshire Med Mal Screening Under Scrutiny
A few years ago, New Hampshire adopted med mal screening panels -- requiring plaintiffs to submit their cases to a panel. While the panel (made up of a doctor, a lawyer, and a judge) (must resist a "...walk into a bar" joke) can't stop a case from going forward, if they vote unanimously in favor or against the plaintiff, the jury is informed of that vote.
Now, according to InsuranceJournal.com, people are trying to see if there's an impact. As the story lays out, the initial indications are unclear; it hasn't made a huge change in costs or speed, but some participants suggest that it just needs to be tweaked.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Hampshire Med Mal Screening Under Scrutiny:
» Around the web, December 21 from PointOfLaw Forum
Peter Schuck's "legislative checklist" is terrific idea for reducing needless litigation -- but of course it assumes that lawmakers want to make laws clear [WSJ law blog] Are New Hampshire's med-mal screening panels working? [TortsProf; earlier here a... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 20, 2008 9:25:58 PM