October 29, 2008
Design Defect Law in Illinois
In a great teaching case (pdf), the Illinois Supreme Court discussed, at length, the development of defective design standards. In particular, the court examined the use of the risk-utility test versus the consumer-expectation test. The court declined to adopt Section 2(b) of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, but found "its formulation of the risk-utility test to be instructive." (Slip Op. at 30). The court then adopted a formulation of the risk-utility test that incorporates consumer-expectation as a factor consistent with comment (f) to the Restatement.
Thanks to Mark Weber (DePaul) for bringing this case to our attention.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Design Defect Law in Illinois :
» Around the web, November 20 from PointOfLaw Forum
Sorry, docs: new health czar Daschle is a longtime trial lawyer ally [Overlawyered] Union-backed ad campaign for EFCA begins; just what economy needs now, business-labor Armageddon [L.A. Times] As electronic discovery proliferates, so do tactical alle... [Read More]
Tracked on Nov 19, 2008 10:01:18 PM