Saturday, October 4, 2008

Abraham on the Prohibition of Party Testimony and Tort Law

Kenneth Abraham (Virginia) has posted to SSRN The Common Law Prohibition on Party Testimony and the Development of Tort Liability.  Here is the abstract:

For two and a half centuries of accident law's history, between about 1600 and 1850, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant in a tort suit could testify in that suit. In fact, during this period the parties could not testify in any civil suit, and the defendant could not testify in a criminal case. These prohibitions were features of a broader common law rule providing that any potential witness who had an "interest" in the outcome of a case was not competent to testify in it. It was not until statutes abolishing this evidentiary prohibition were enacted in England in the 1840s, and in the United States between the late 1840s and the 1890s, that the parties were permitted to testify in tort (and other) suits. This Essay addresses the influence of the prohibition against party testimony on the development of tort liability prior to the middle of the 19th century.

--CJR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2008/10/abraham-on-the.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01053530784f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Abraham on the Prohibition of Party Testimony and Tort Law:

» Around the web, October 8 from PointOfLaw Forum
Patent trolls -- in Germany? [IP Law and Business via Securing Innovation] Where Milton Friedman's memory is defamed, chances are someone has been reading worst-book-of-year author Naomi Klein [Norberg, Cato, Reason] New site aimed at doctors on polit... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 7, 2008 8:16:07 PM

Comments

Post a comment