TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Univ. School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Sebok on Alien Tort Claims Act

In his latest FindLaw column, Tony Sebok addresses the two recent opinions by the Second Circuit on the Alien Tort Claims Act:  Khulumani v. Barclay National Bank and Ntsebeza v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.  Although the Second Circuit reversed a dismissal by the district court, Sebok argues that the substantive ruling on ATCA aiding and abetting liability may prove to be a "pyrrhic victory" for the plaintiffs:

The test based in international human rights law is set out in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: One is guilty of aiding and abetting a crime if one renders aid to someone who commits a crime, and does so "[f]or the purpose of facilitating the commission of such a crime."

Judge Korman and Judge Katzmann agree that the Rome Statute should apply. Since they constitute a majority of the panel, that is the standard Judge Sprizzo must apply on remand.

In contrast, the common law test is less demanding (and thus, more pro-plaintiff). On the Second Circuit panel, Judge Hall was the only judge who endorsed this test. He quoted the Restatement (Second) of Torts ยง876(b), which provides that one is liable for aiding and abetting the tortious conduct of another "if he . . . knows that the other's conduct constitutes a breach of duty and gives substantial assistance or encouragement to the other."

In his next column, Sebok will analyze which test for aiding and abetting should apply to the ATCA. 

- SBS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2007/10/sebok-on-alien-.html

Current Affairs, Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54f1193ed8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sebok on Alien Tort Claims Act :

Comments

Post a comment