Tuesday, October 30, 2007

N.J. Supreme Court Hears Arugments In Vioxx Med Monitoring Claims

The New Jersey Law Journal (via law.com) reports on the oral arguments before the New Jersey Supreme Court on whether Merck can be held liable for medical monitoring for individuals who may have suffered "silent heart attacks" from use of the drug Vioxx.  John Beisner of O'Melveny & Myers argued on behalf of Merck, while Elizabeth Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser argued for the putative class. 

- SBS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2007/10/nj-supreme-cour.html

Products Liability | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54f2500348833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference N.J. Supreme Court Hears Arugments In Vioxx Med Monitoring Claims:

Comments

Post a comment