TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Commonwealth Law School

Monday, June 4, 2007

California's UCL - "Inference of Common Reliance" Standard

The California Court of Appeals (Third District) recently held that plaintiffs could base a class action under California's Unfair Competition Law on an "inference of common reliance" (as opposed to actual reliance): McAdams v. Monier

Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant - a manufacturer of roof tiles - failed to disclose that the color of the tiles would fade away leaving bare concrete.   The UCL count required plaintiffs to have "suffered injury in fact...and have lost money a result of" defendant's failure to disclose.  (California's UCL was amended by Proposition 64 in 2004; prior to these amendments, no reliance was required under the UCL). 

The trial court denied plaintiff's motion to certify the class, finding the amended UCL required a showing of actual reliance, which defeated commonality.  The Court of Appeals, however, reversed imposing "an inference of common reliance" standard.


MDLs and Class Actions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference California's UCL - "Inference of Common Reliance" Standard:


Post a comment