TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Commonwealth Law School

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Phillips Out - Award Reversed 5-4

In a Breyer opinion, the Supreme Court vacated a $79.5 million punitive damage award.  Key points at first reading:

  • Punishing defendants for harm to nonparties is a due process violation.  Evidence of harm to nonparties can be relevant to determine reprehensibility, but not as a basis for a punishment increase.
  • Let me say that again: harm to others cannot be a basis for punishment.  This is new, and a big deal.
  • So if a state is going to allow harm to others into evidence, it also has to create procedures to ensure that it only goes to determining the risk of harm to others (= reprehensibility), but not to the amount of damages awarded.
  • Because the remand on this issue will probably result in a different award, the Court doesn't deal with whether the amount is unconstitutionally excessive.

Stevens, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Scalia dissented in a total of three opinions.

Damages | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Phillips Out - Award Reversed 5-4:


Post a comment