Friday, December 22, 2006
The Scientist has a nice wrap-up of the chromium story as it stands now.
(Here's a prior post. Short form: Paper retracted after journal concludes support was not disclosed when it should have been and that the paper was written by third-party litigation consultants. Named author now contends that she, in fact, did write it (with another, now deceased, author), and that the third-party entity just provided trivial help.)