TortsProf Blog

Editor: Christopher J. Robinette
Widener Commonwealth Law School

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

The Plame Suit

FindLaw has a good piece (somewhat calmer than a lot of the initial columns) by Matthew R. Segal about Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson's suit against Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, and Dick Cheney.  Segal's conclusion:

In the end, though, who is at fault for those costs? Plame and Wilson surely have resorted to an imperfect method of learning the truth only because, for the past three years, Administration officials have decided not to reveal it. (The Administration's secrecy must be particularly frustrating to those who believe that there was no vendetta to disclose Plame's identity and, consequently, nothing to hide.)

President Bush said in September 2003 that he wanted "to know the truth." And the public deserves to know it too--because Administration officials may have committed crimes, and, more fundamentally, because this case is connected to the justification for the war that costs us lives, and dominates our politics now....

* * *

In sum, there is indeed plenty to dislike about the lawsuit filed by Plame and Wilson. But there is also plenty to dislike about the conduct of the Administration officials whose failure to level with the public brought us to this point.

Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Plame Suit:


It is always surprising to see how out of touch with reality people who live eclosed in "the liberal bubble" can be. Try reading Christopher Hitchins latest article on Wilson Plame, and try, try, try to include facts in your mental universe (If you did so, you wouldn't have labelled Mr. Segal's delusionary piece as "good".

Posted by: Sam | Jul 26, 2006 2:47:47 PM

Thanks for coming by. Perhaps you could provide a link to the Hitchens piece you're referencing?

Posted by: Bill Childs | Jul 27, 2006 5:25:32 AM

Post a comment