Thursday, June 1, 2006

Punitives and the Supreme Court

David Sirota has this piece about the importance of Supreme Court nominees outside the hot-button social issues, in particular in the context of the Williams cert grant.

He doesn't note that Scalia and Thomas dissented in State Farm, which is presumably the position he considers proper.  He does mention Scalia in a paragraph asserting potential corruption in the court system.

[via Greedy Trial Lawyer.]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/tortsprof/2006/06/punitives_and_t.html

Damages | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83562df7b69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Punitives and the Supreme Court:

Comments

Post a comment