April 4, 2008
Ninth Circuit Says No to CDA Safe Harbour to Roommates.con in Housing Case
Roommates.com has lost an appeal in the Ninth Circuit over whether questions asked in creating a profile of its users violates the Fair Housing Act. The case was brought by the Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley and the Fair Housing Council of San Diego. The District Court granted summary judgment to Roommates on the basis of the company falling into the Safe Harbor provision of the Communications Decency Act. The Ninth Circuit disagreed because questions such as gender, sexual preference, and others, developed by Roommates and required by the site for its users turned them into a publisher rather than an ISP. Roommates effectively became responsible for the content. The Court distinguished the Craigslist case from the Seventh Circuit where that site escaped liability as it merely republished postings without edits.
April 4, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ninth Circuit Says No to CDA Safe Harbour to Roommates.con in Housing Case: