<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Statutory Construction Blog</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/" />
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370" title="Statutory Construction Blog" /> 
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-483370</id>
    <updated>2008-09-04T11:39:59Z</updated>
    <subtitle>A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/StatutoryConstructionBlog" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">461204</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://www.feedburner.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry>
        <title />
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/09/interesting-spl.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=55119322" title="" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/09/interesting-spl.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-55119322</id>
        <published>2008-09-04T07:39:59-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-04T11:39:59Z</updated>
        <summary>Interesting split on sentencing guidelines as ex post facto laws in U.S. v. Andrews, __ F.3d __ (D.C. Cir. 2008), with one judge concurring. [I]n... United States v. Booker, the Supreme Court held that the Sentencing Guidelines must now be...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>A random Thursday night Note</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/a-random-thursd.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54854042" title="A random Thursday night Note" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/a-random-thursd.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54854042</id>
        <published>2008-08-28T21:12:12-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-29T01:12:44Z</updated>
        <summary>I've now been teaching law school for 5 years (starting my sixth). I practiced law for 14 before then, and still do some legal work, which I must admit I enjoy and it keeps me up to date on the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Conference Announcement - Belfast October 2008</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/conference-anno.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54707224" title="Conference Announcement - Belfast October 2008" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/conference-anno.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54707224</id>
        <published>2008-08-26T11:57:06-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-26T15:57:33Z</updated>
        <summary>Presuming to Interpret: Basic Principles of Lawin Stautory Interpretation, will be held on October 10 to 12, 2008 in Belfast, Ireland. It's sponsored by the Statute Law Society and will feature sessions on comparative interpretation and other interseting issues. The...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit Issues Contextual Opinion on Bankruptcy Act § 363(f)(5)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/ninth-circuit-1.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54693600" title="Ninth Circuit Issues Contextual Opinion on Bankruptcy Act § 363(f)(5)" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/ninth-circuit-1.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54693600</id>
        <published>2008-08-26T05:43:42-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-26T09:44:09Z</updated>
        <summary>In Clear Channel, Inc. v. Knupfer, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. July 18, 2008), the court issued a fairly thoughtful analysis of § 363(f)(5) and related provisions, including an interesting discussion of the textual history of the statute as well...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Split on Whether Cases Can be Removed from State Agencies</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/split-on-whethe.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54547036" title="Split on Whether Cases Can be Removed from State Agencies" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/split-on-whethe.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54547036</id>
        <published>2008-08-22T06:44:22-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-22T10:53:20Z</updated>
        <summary>I teach civ pro, and so this is particularly interesting to me. 28 USC 1441(a) authorizes removal of "any civil action brought in a State court" over which there's federal subject matter jurisdiction. What if it's an administrative proceeding? The...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit Issues First Impression of Tax Code Provision</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/ninth-circuit-i.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54546852" title="Ninth Circuit Issues First Impression of Tax Code Provision" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/ninth-circuit-i.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54546852</id>
        <published>2008-08-22T06:33:42-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-22T10:34:10Z</updated>
        <summary>Ordlock v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, __ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 2008) required the Ninth Circuit to give a first impression interpretation of 26 U.S.C. § 6015 and the interplay between federal income tax law and California community property law....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Iowa Supreme Court Rejects, um, Creative Workers Compensation Interpretation</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/iowa-supreme-co.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54339676" title="Iowa Supreme Court Rejects, um, Creative Workers Compensation Interpretation" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/iowa-supreme-co.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54339676</id>
        <published>2008-08-18T07:02:14-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-18T11:02:27Z</updated>
        <summary>I love lawyers who are creative, even when they go one step beyond. Iowa Code section 85.38(2) relates to the issue of employer credits when payments are made by a group health plan. This provision provides, in relevant part: "In...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Thoughtful Essay on Hamdan, Military Commissions, Etc.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/thoughtful-essa.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54275654" title="Thoughtful Essay on Hamdan, Military Commissions, Etc." />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/thoughtful-essa.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54275654</id>
        <published>2008-08-16T06:57:17-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-16T10:57:29Z</updated>
        <summary>The statutory issues were discussed long ago here, but this essay I found quite interesting, though it's not so much about statutory interpretation as about broader issues and the meaning of war, punishment, and the difference between criminal and military...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Split on Meaning of "materiality" under False Claims Act</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/split-on-meanin.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54231246" title="Split on Meaning of &quot;materiality&quot; under False Claims Act" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/split-on-meanin.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54231246</id>
        <published>2008-08-15T10:44:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-15T14:45:19Z</updated>
        <summary>In U.S. v. Bourseau, 531 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2008), the court affirmed convictions of defendants under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. Title 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(7), the reverse false claims provision of the FCA, punishes...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Recent Decision of First Impression On Michigan Property and Child Support Law</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/recent-decision.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54172854" title="Recent Decision of First Impression On Michigan Property and Child Support Law" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/recent-decision.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54172854</id>
        <published>2008-08-14T07:29:46-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-14T11:29:58Z</updated>
        <summary>In Walters v. Leech, __ N.W.2d __ (Mich. App. July 22, 2008), the court analyzed an interesting property law/tax law question involving whether a child support lien could be asserted against real property owned by the plaintiff and spouse as...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Are Dogs "Livestock"?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/are-dogs-livest.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54143046" title="Are Dogs &quot;Livestock&quot;?" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/are-dogs-livest.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54143046</id>
        <published>2008-08-13T14:41:09-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-13T18:41:24Z</updated>
        <summary>This isn't a straight up statutory interpretation case, but rather one involving an easement, but the court relies heavily on the fact that statutes differ in their definitions of "livestock" in holding that whether dogs were "livestock" in terms of...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Fifth Circuit Applies Louisiana Statutory Directives in Case of First Impression</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/fifth-circuit-a.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54129396" title="Fifth Circuit Applies Louisiana Statutory Directives in Case of First Impression" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/fifth-circuit-a.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54129396</id>
        <published>2008-08-13T09:45:35-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-13T13:45:48Z</updated>
        <summary>In Bernhard Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. St. Paul Companies, 2008 WL 3244145 (5th Cir. Aug. 8 2008), the court gave a first impression interpretation of La. Rev. Stat. 9:5606, which is essentially a statute of limitations for claims against insurance...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Split on interpretation of mens rea requirement in 21 USC 841(c)(2)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/split-on-interp.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=54090888" title="Split on interpretation of mens rea requirement in 21 USC 841(c)(2)" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/split-on-interp.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-54090888</id>
        <published>2008-08-12T12:36:32-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-12T16:36:42Z</updated>
        <summary>This statute makes it illegal for any person to knowingly or intentionally possess or distribute “a listed chemical knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the listed chemical will be used to manufacture a controlled substance . . ....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Tid Bits - Catching up</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/tid-bits---catc.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=53962190" title="Tid Bits - Catching up" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/08/tid-bits---catc.html" thr:count="1" thr:when="2008-08-12T20:12:44Z" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-53962190</id>
        <published>2008-08-09T08:04:39-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-09T12:04:52Z</updated>
        <summary>Michigan Supreme Court interprets med mal reform statute as amended. The statute was MCL 600.2912a(2), which prohibits recovery for the loss of an opportunity to survive or achieve a better result unless the opportunity was greater than 50 percent. The...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Amicus Brief of Linguistics Professors</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/07/amicus-brief-of.html" />
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.typepad.com/t/atom/weblog/blog_id=483370/entry_id=53174254" title="Amicus Brief of Linguistics Professors" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/statutory/2008/07/amicus-brief-of.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-53174254</id>
        <published>2008-07-24T11:39:33-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-24T15:40:30Z</updated>
        <summary>This is of interest, an amicus brief filed on behalf of no party by a group of linguistics professors in the U.S. Supreme Court, available here. This is from the brief in U.S. v. Hayes, filed by Neal Goldfarb at...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Prfhricik</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        
        


    </entry>
 
</feed>
