« January 4, 2009 - January 10, 2009 | Main | January 25, 2009 - January 31, 2009 »

January 16, 2009

Interesting federal-state split

As you know, many states pattern their statutes after federal law. So, when there's a federal interpretation often, but not always, the states follow suit. There's an interesting example of this discussed in Woomert v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission, (Iowa App. 2008), available here. There's so much underlying this issue that I don't think has been explored: is it proper, for example, for this court to simply say that because the Iowa statute is "modeled after" a federal statute, that Iowa courts should "consistently employ[] federal analysis" when interpreting it? That seems to suggest that by adopting a federal statute, a legislature is presumed to adopt federal "law" regarding interpretation of a statute... which doesn't necessarily mirror state law.

Anyhow, this particular case notes that state courts split on whether the "Ricks/Chardon" rule applies to state analogs, which suggests that some states don't blindly follow federal interpretations. I think there's a law review article here, or at least some additions to the second edition of our book, which we're working on!

January 16, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

January 15, 2009

30,000 hits...

I just noticed that over the break we managed to go over 30,000 hits. That's pretty amazing. Enjoy.

January 15, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Sex Between Teachers and 18 Year Old Students A-Okay in Washington

There's an article here, and the opinion, State v. Hirschfelder (Wash. App. 1/13/09) is here. Among other things, the court relied on grammatical rules concerning nonrestrictive phrases, as well as legislative history. It was a unanimous holding and, after reading the opinion, I think they got it right. Now, whether it's wise policy....

Thanks to Professor Spencer Clough for the tip!

January 15, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Assessing CAFA's Stated Jurisdictional Policy

This is the title of a new article by Professor Richard L. Marcus, published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and available here. I post it because interpreting CAFA has been the subject of several posts here. The article appears as part of a symposium on CAFA, and you can find the table of contents here.

January 15, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack