« Amendment to California Bar Act Retroactive | Main | Tid Bits »

September 8, 2008

Meaning is Plain to Two Circuits ... but a Circuit Split

Love this: "Although they agree that
the plain language of the statute resolves the dispute, they
reach directly opposite conclusions." Bodine v. Graco, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Owens v. Samkle Auto. Inc., 425 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2005) (per curiam); Ioffe v. Skokie Motor Sales, Inc., 414 F.3d 708 (7th Cir. 2005).

The issue? Whether the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (“the Odometer Act” or “the Act”), 49 U.S.C. §§ 32701-32711, and its implementing regulations, 49 C.F.R. pt. 580, allow a private right of action where the fraud relates to something other than the vehicle’s mileage, such as its accident history.

Interesting fun read.

September 8, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5550f5a718834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Meaning is Plain to Two Circuits ... but a Circuit Split:

Comments

Post a comment